This study also discusses the theoretical and practical implications.Ĭitations are valuable capital in academy as the number of citations is the most frequently used indicator in evaluating the quality of papers, journals, researchers, and universities. The researchers call for more effort to discover new models for writing review genres in the EFL/ESL context. The results showcased that there were currently a limited number of review types in social science disciplines.
108 vital points pdf software#
A mixed analysis approach (e.g., qualitative analysis combined with quantitative analysis) was conducted to further examine the selected articles using the data visualization software CiteSpace. They identified the published articles specific to the review genres via a structured keyword search in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar (from the years 2019–2022). The researchers of this study employed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. In this review, the researchers would like to offer an overview of different types of review articles and identify the trend in the development of the review article genre. However, very few studies have focused on review genres. The practice of review writing is an essential component of postgraduate students’ academic studies for graduation requirement and especially for those who are undergoing their postgraduate studies by theses by publication. Notwithstanding such limitations, this typology provides a valuable reference point for those commissioning, conducting, supporting or interpreting reviews, both within health information and the wider health care domain. A limited number of review types are currently utilized within the health information domain.įew review types possess prescribed and explicit methodologies and many fall short of being mutually exclusive. A description of the key characteristics is given, together with perceived strengths and weaknesses. A simple analytical framework - Search, AppraisaL, Synthesis and Analysis (SALSA) - was used to examine the main review types.įourteen review types and associated methodologies were analysed against the SALSA framework, illustrating the inputs and processes of each review type. The objective of this study is to provide descriptive insight into the most common types of reviews, with illustrative examples from health and health information domains.įollowing scoping searches, an examination was made of the vocabulary associated with the literature of review and synthesis (literary warrant).
108 vital points pdf full#
However, the diversity of terminology used means that the full potential of these review types may be lost amongst a confusion of indistinct and misapplied terms.
The expansion of evidence-based practice across sectors has lead to an increasing variety of review types.
0 kommentar(er)
